Yahoo! Services

Account Options

New User? Sign Up Sign In Help

Yahoo! Search

Music Blogs

Can McFly make the transition to pop institution?

Posted Mon 19 May 2008 11:55AM BST by Chris Cooke in a-CMU-blog

So CMU's favourite boy band McFly have "parted ways" with their record label, Universal/Island Records, and will self-release their next album – out in July – via their own new independent label Super Records.  

"Parted ways with your label" is a much used euphemism in pop circles, of course, mainly for being dropped, though reports suggest it was actually McFly who chose not to re-do the deal with major record company Universal, rather than the other way round.

I am basing that mainly on a 'source' quoted in the Sun, who told the tab: "McFly are a huge money spinner for Island Records, so they were desperate for them to stay. They offered them better contracts with a bit more money, but the lads have grown up and realise the label don't want to take them in the same direction they do".

I'd question a little the suggestion that McFly are a "huge money spinner" for Universal/Island. While they are certainly a successful pop band, and have enjoyed considerable success in the singles charts, their album sales – where Island will make their money – are solid but not phenomenal. To be honest, I don't see losing Tom, Danny, Dougie and Harry causing too many headaches among the bean-counters at the major, even if it does mean the label no longer counts one of the UK's more successful pop bands of recent years on its roster.

But whatever, the other bit of that Sun source quote is actually more interesting. It's quite fashionable at the moment for established bands at the end of their recording contracts to go it alone, or do a deal with a company other than a label, mainly on the basis that the traditional record industry is in a bit of disarray at the moment, and some think that if you're an established band you're better off out of it. But if the Sun's source is to be believed, McFly have parted company with Universal/Island not because they feel the traditional record companies are all doomed (and it has to be said, if they are, Universal UK is probably least doomed), but because the label doesn't "want to take them in the same direction they do".

Now, what does that mean? Possibly that McFly – who have long vocally disliked being dubbed a 'boy band' – are desperate to be taken more seriously, while their (former) major label see more money to be made in continuing to market the band as an easy-on-the-ear, easy-on-the-eye teen pop band. 

I'm speculating wildly here of course, but that's because I've been wondering for a long time now if and how McFly – who have had quite a bit more longevity than I think most expected them to have – can successfully make the move from a teen band who make fine pop songs, to a national pop institution loved and enjoyed by all.

I'm being quite serious when I call McFly 'CMU favourites' – I really do love their music, and rate many of their songs as some of the best British pop of this decade – so really want that transition to happen. And if it does, I'm confident that the wider pop audience will realise there's a whole bunch of McFly songs that are a whole lot better than most people have so far appreciated.

But how to do it? Well, some McFly fans will point out that early pop bands like The Beatles, Beach Boys and The Who became more widely credible with time. Though whether the passing of time itself brought on that credibility, or whether the McFly boys will have to make an album en par with 'Sgt Pepper', 'Pet Sounds' or 'Tommy' to have their early work re-evaluated by the mainstream I'm not sure. More recently appointed pop institutions – most notably Kylie and Take That – managed to crossover simply through a well timed re-launch, a champion comeback single and, in Kylie's case, a killer pair of hot pants. Though McFly's product is more closely linked to those earlier examples, so I'm not sure Kylie or Take That are especially useful case studies.

So, what can Tom, Danny, Dougie and Harry do? Well, personally I'd suggest some clever collaborations and strategic gigging. An independent outlook label-wise might help too – but whichever band members and managers will be making the decisions in the new operation need to be clever. I hope they are, because I really want them to succeed. 'I'll Be OK', 'I Don't Know Why' and 'Too Close For Comfort' are pop classics, and I don't care what anyone else thinks.

Though if you've any thoughts on how McFly can make the transition – or perhaps you think it's never gonna happen – that I would be interested to hear...

4 Comments

1. KatieD -
I am a US fan of McFly. I just discover their music in February. I am really excited that they have decided to release their records on their own. I was wondering if they will ever get tired of constantly appearing on different tv shows,and whatever.
But, I 've been thinking since April that McFLy will have to make something akin to the Who's Tommy in order to be taken seriously.
I just really hope they prove everyone one wrong and make enjoyable music.

2. loklok -
I'm from Hong Kong !I really want them to come here to have a concert!THere'remany people luv them!!
THEy 're brilliant!!!!!I'm their superfans!
I 'm sure they'll do better and succeed!!!!
can't wait for their new album by 100% MCFLY!

3. Yahoo! Music User -
i completely agree with your opinion based on how McFLY are highly succeeding and are completely under appreciated. i think that by going solo the lads will open a wider market and get more people involved in their music.
i also love your suggestion of collaborations but they have done a few (roger daltrey, charlotte church, brian may and busted to name a few).
i think they need to concentrate on widening that already massive fan base if they want to be unclassified as a boy band. perhaps doing more over 18 gigs or 'maturing' their music (i personally do not feel their music is immature but i have heard other views) will widen the fan base.
overall, McFLy are highly talented and i have every faith in them to do well. Looking back at their awards and acheievments it seems they are clearly a popular band. its not often you can say you beat the Beatles to being the youngest band to get a number one!

4. Christian -
Is this a joke, they will never ever be take seriously as a 'proper band' because they don't make good music. They do NOT make 'fine pop songs' there are hundreds of up and coming and current acts out there now who make truly fine pop songs 100 times better than Mcfly's boyband tripe. Comparing them to the Beatles and the Who is sacrilege to me. Do the music world a favour Mcfly and do a disappearing act.
Leave Your Comment
You must sign in to leave a comment
Select a Blog Posts
a-CMU-blog
by Chris Cooke
396
Chart Watch UK
by James Masterton
127
Down The Front
by Reviews Editor
49
Recommenders
by Reviews Editor
41
Snap, Crackle and Pop
by Dave Rumour
194
The Guestlist
by Mitch Carter
88
This Day In Music
by Neil Cossar
336
Touching The Void
by Johnny Famethrowa
227
Video Premieres
by The Editor
43

Most Comments

Take That Eurovision!

Dotmusic -
Tue 24 Nov 2009 10:42AM GMT

Dotmusic - Gary Barlow to write 2010 theme tune? More »

More News Stories