Yahoo! Services

Account Options

New User? Sign Up Sign In Help

Yahoo! Search

Music Blogs

Manic Street Preachers Banned

Posted Fri 15 May 2009 11:34AM BST by Dave Rumour in Snap, Crackle and Pop
You probably wouldn't know it looking at their rather tired 21st century image but the Manic Street Preachers used to be a quite terrifying prospect for some, full of provoctive teen rage, playing "Top Of The Pops" in balaclavas, while tragic lost member Richey Edwards famously slashed the words "For Real" into his bloody arm in a bid to impress former music journalist Steve Lamacq. They might be a lot older now but that's not stopped their new album being banned by four of the UK's big retail giants, with one supermarket calling the artwork "inappropriate".

The cover for "Journal For Plague Lovers" (pictured) depicts a girl seemingly with a bloody and battered face and has been painted by acclaimed artist Jenny Saville. The record is considered a follow-up to the Welsh rockers' landmark 1994 album "The Holy Bible", which also featured one of her controversial works. Sainsburys, Tesco, Asda and Morrisons have all refused to stock it with the original image, as Nicola Williamson, music buyer for Sainsbury's explained: "We felt that some customers might consider this particular album cover to be inappropriate if it were prominently displayed on the shelf. "

The Manics have reacted with bafflement at the news, calling their decision "truly bizarre" and pointing to the fact that such shops regularly display products of a similarly graphic nature. "We just thought it was a beautiful painting. We were all in total agreement", explained singer James Dean Bradfield, continuing: "You can have lovely shiny buttocks and guns everywhere in the supermarket on covers of magazines and CDs, but you show a piece of art and people just freak out". "Journal For Plague Lovers" is released on Monday but will only be available in these stores in a special sleeve provided by the publisher.

Are you shocked by the artwork to the new Manic Street Preachers album? Or do you think Sainsburys and co have gone too far in banning it? Have your say here...
1151 Comments

21. Marina -
People need to stop being so sensitive.

22. neil -
Whats wrong with it? We can go to Tescos and buy battery chickens who have suffered painfully in cramped cages but we can't bear to look at a picture?

23. Fencemaster -
yeah, a battered girl is art. great argument. about as strong as mp's fraudulent expense claims being submitted 'in the best faith'.

24. C R -
Understandable that supermarkets refuse to sell it!
Id imagine MOST manic fans would go to a music shop anyway!!

25. GARY -
ITS A PAINTING FOR GODS SAKE WHAT IS THIS WORLD COMING TOO..

26. Ellie -
JDB makes an excellent point. Culture nazi supermarkets are in no position to critisize anyone, certainly not creative people.

27. Ellie -
JDB makes an excellent point. Culture nazi supermarkets are in no position to critisize anyone, certainly not creative people.

28. Yahoo! Music User -
Sounds very Wal-Mart to me...

29. Yahoo! Music User -
Pictures of scantily clad women being fondled by men, as often seen on teh covers of rap albums, are much more damaging than this.

30. David H -
seriously... its PC gone mad...
i agree whole-heartidly with richietees... its not as if they beat up a girl then took a photo, its a painting and they dont ban footage of people lying dead on the news. whatever next? banning death from all tv productions incase it offends someone who's relative has died? just sell the damn cd im sure its great music :)

31. Yahoo! Music User -
Um - it's just a picture ... no more shocking than many images regularly and routinely available on supermarket shelves.

32. Stefan -
I agree with JDB, its a great painting...

33. Emma -
It is a shocking image, but like James Dean Bradfield says, there are more inappropriate images to be seen in supermarkets on magazine covers etc. (and like the man whose trousers fell down in the queue in front of us the other week! He had nothing underneath and no one said anything to him!!! Lol!)

34. Yahoo! Music User -
its not shocking at all, its art.
like they said, you can have practically naked people on full display on magazine covers, and for some reason, the shops dont seem to think this innappropriate.
its a painting, FFS

35. Finola -
This is a wonderful piece of artwork I am guessing it has ben designed that way to provoke an emotional reaction. Banning personal expressions within art/design isn't good for society.

36. Chris B Chikin -
Which is worse? A piece of artwork by a world renowned artist, or a picture of a 'gangsta' pointing a gun at the viewer? Yet Thse supermarkets seem to have no issues when it comes to stocking the latter.

37. ingrid -
it's disturbing..reminds me of industrial school stories..

38. Anthony -
ugghh its just an image!, what do they think it's going to do, crawl out of the case? haha

39. benjamin -
I think its more likely that they thought the album was crap and came up with this lame excuse as not to offend the record company.

40. Chief of McAndreis -
i do not see much wrong here. it makes you think. to me the Know-it-alls got it wrong again.

he wanted you to think and you are, what better way to get the message across
Page:  1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 
Leave Your Comment
You must sign in to leave a comment
Select a Blog Posts
a-CMU-blog
by Chris Cooke
396
Chart Watch UK
by James Masterton
127
Down The Front
by Reviews Editor
49
Recommenders
by Reviews Editor
41
Snap, Crackle and Pop
by Dave Rumour
194
The Guestlist
by Mitch Carter
88
This Day In Music
by Neil Cossar
336
Touching The Void
by Johnny Famethrowa
227
Video Premieres
by The Editor
43

Music Blog Archives

Most Comments

Jay-Z for BRITs

Dotmusic -
Tue 24 Nov 2009 11:30AM GMT

Dotmusic - Rap don to perform medley at London bash More »

More News Stories